Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube LinkedIn

Editorials

COP26: Globalization by necessity

COP26: Globalization by necessity
©EPA-EFE/MAST IRHAM  |   A clean water vendor pushes his cart as children play on the high tide flood water at a residential area in North Jakarta, Indonesia, 09 November 2021. According to Deltares' report, the northwestern part of Jakarta is sinking at a rate of seven to 10 centimeters per year, while it is between two and four centimeters in the northeast, making Jakarta among the fastest sinking cities in the world. Environment activists and leaders are gathered in Glasgow at the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26) runs from 31 October to 12 November 2021.

It’s as if the Moon had showed us its dark side. Or as though the space between continents had shrunk. Such is the extent of the transformation undergone by Earth’s atmosphere. Sadly, the latest such transformation passed unnoticed – and it’s real.

That’s how The Economist described what we know as “climate change” in a preview of the event held in Glasgow, Scotland – COP26. Everything began in the mid-19th century, in the first half of the industrial era: the perfect example for the way history, technology and climate intertwine and affect each other over time. It was then that the first fossil-fuel industrial engines were engineered. Except that the smoke they produced, filling the chests of business owners and inventors with pride, was toxic. And it particularly affected the future generations, since carbon dioxide (CO2) in its composition was primarily responsible for the greenhouse gas emissions modern scientists would identify. The Economist also provides a few statistical data: until the early 20th century, the level of CO2 reported in the Earth’s atmosphere was 280 parts per million (ppm). In 1910, it climbed to 300 ppm. Today, CO2 levels have hit 412 ppm and continue to rise.

COP stands for “Conference of Parties” – a meeting of heads of state and government who’ve taken an interest in climate change. The interesting part is the number: this is the 26th such meeting, organized by the United Nations. Like previous editions, this year’s conference saw warnings being issued over the urgency of remedial measures. “This is not a time for words, but a time for action”, said Queen Elisabeth of Great Britain, born at a time when the air was still clean and people were still oblivious to the notion of “ppm”. By continuing to burn fossil fuels, “the world is digging its own grave”, UN Secretary General António Guterres also said. British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, the host of the meeting in Glasgow, said that “the world is one minute to midnight”.

Talking about catastrophic scenarios, such as the ones suggested by the abovementioned statements, did not however bring about effective action. Targets promised by governments to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions were more often than not ignored. Just like the “ppm”, the number of climate conferences hosted by the UN is constantly growing. Yet pundits warn against a subtle change of attitude at the level of COP26. The number of voices challenging the scientific basis of the effects of climate change is going down. People who stall for time no longer challenge the facts, probably lacking the means and running out of ideas as to how to deal with the harsh reality.

The balancing act a century later

And the harsh reality is that the effect of the CO2 build-up in our atmosphere had a crucial contribution to the climatic changes we’ve noticed in recent years. The most dramatic of these is “global warming”, something which entails, among other things, modifications in natural habitats, extreme weather phenomena, the melting of polar ice caps or the rise in ocean levels. The stake of every COP is to determine governments and large corporations to abandon their CO2-emitting industries, so that the average temperature on Earth should not exceed the preindustrial era reference level by more than 1.5 Centigrade. Something which is a lot easier said than done. Merely realizing what needs to be done doesn’t take care of the problem. Here we can notice another silent progress of apparently failed conferences of previous years. More and more lawmakers acknowledge the fact that the world is not aligned to the same point in history. Europe has moved past the industrial era and is taking major, clear-cut steps to curb its CO2 emissions. Asia, on the other hand, is at the apex of the century of coal, oil and gas-based consumption, and is having trouble dialing it down to a slower pace. If we were to estimate the amount of CO2 that  was historically produced by each continent, we would notice that starting 1750, despite all the recently introduced measures, Europe (including Russia) contributed 525 billion tons, ranking first, followed by Asia with an aggregate 608 billion tons, and North America with 470 tons. Hence the impression of solidarity that COP26 participants want to get across more than in previous conferences.

There are different sides to this quintessentially ecological problem. Politics prevails in Europe and America. In Asia, economy comes first. The Americans didn’t pick another “climate change denialist” such as former president Donald Trump as their representative in the climate conference. Nor has his successor been consistent in his attitude. For instance, over 40 countries made a pledge in Glasgow to eliminate their coal-based energy output in the near future. The United States was however not on the list, although one might have expected as much. In this respect, Joe Biden’s position seems to be much closer to the Trump administration rather than Barack Obama, who introduced measures restricting mining activities.

In China, however, the industry is largely dependent on fossil fuels. Chinese large infrastructure projects, for instance, which hold millions of jobs in the balance, rely heavily on cementworks, which in turn employ a pollutant piece of technology. As one contemporary author, Anselm Jappe, would say, if the cement industry were a country, then it would rank third in the world in terms of carbon dioxide emissions, after China and the USA. For China, a country accounting for half of Asia’s total CO2 output, this issue has serious economic implications.

Romania - ecology without ecologists

In this contemporary whirlpool, there’s little Romania can say or do. If ever this country had a chance to be at the top of the CO2 emission list, that was a long time ago, when the economy was being steered by communist central authorities and the country’s steelworks were burning metal around the clock. Romania’s mines started attracting heat ever since the ‘90s, but not necessarily due to their pollution, but due to their economic inefficiency in a market economy. So, when president Iohannis said in Glasgow that Romania “has one of the lowest greenhouse gas emissions per capita in the European Union”, he was right. Yet Romania’s positive rating in this respect is rather circumstantial, not the result of a serious agenda. I got the opportunity to travel to Munich, Germany, where I was shocked by the density of bike traffic in the city center, as well as by the green protests staged during the few days of my stay there. Here, I could notice an active interest in protecting the environment, an idea capable of mobilizing both civilian and political support. In Romania, as political theorist Cristian Preda said, even the ecological parties created at the start of the “period of transition” are long gone.

It’s clear that COP26 didn’t need to remind us that, when it comes to combating climate change, mankind is going in circles. Figures show that, since the 1992 climate conference held in Rio de Janeiro, an event as “historic” as the one in Glasgow this year or in Paris in 2015, when world leaders decided to keep the global temperature rise below 1.5 degrees Celsius, the share of energy produced by solar panels and wind turbines rose from zero to 3% of the total output. The share of nuclear energy went down from over 5% to 4%. And the share of hydroelectric power remained constant, standing at some 6%. Otherwise, energy continues to be produced at industrial-era standards, coal alone accounting for 37% of the world’s total energy output. These figures will likely come as a shock to future generations.

On the other hand, we are growing increasingly aware about the seriousness of our current predicament. As a consequence, we are getting more information about climate change and have become more responsible. Naturally, we cannot undo the past. And yet amidst all the bad, we’ve learned to appreciate the good as well, a result of our evolution that involved, among other things, going through the industrial era. And now we can make better decisions. Already some banks have shown reluctance to finance polluting businesses, such as coal extractions. Technologies have been developed to help store carbon dioxide, one of them using basalt, the rock most of Iceland’s soil is made of. Such technologies are currently prohibitively expensive, but the costs of carbon dioxide emissions are also soaring, as companies grow more watchful. Researchers claim there are other, easier ways of keeping in check the emission of other greenhouse gases (such as methane, currently used in the natural gas industry, a byproduct of cattle breeding processes or land fill emissions) rather than traditional methods of collecting carbon dioxide. Moreover, the share of green energy has good chances of increasing, some specialists claiming it could reach 30% in twenty years’ time. A lot depends on how fast societies are willing to take consistent action that would eventually yield concrete results in an attempt at averting a global-scale ecological disaster. The entire planet must fall in synch eventually, willingly or not.


Other articles
Russia’s relations with the West are more complicated in the Putin era than during the Cold War

Russia’s relations with the West are more complicated in the Putin era than during the Cold War

In a little over four years, Russia has become increasingly belligerent towards the West, hitting a new milestone, which is interesting, to put it mildly: three hundred and eleven (!) Russian diplomats have been expelled from the United States and Europe due to their actions in these states.

How the pandemic brought together the far-right, anti-vaxxers and conspiracy buffs: the Serbian case

How the pandemic brought together the far-right, anti-vaxxers and conspiracy buffs: the Serbian case

The coronavirus pandemic has changed the world we live in, affecting our lives and habits. Changes are visible in every sphere of society, and every change has its impact on political trends and vice versa. On the one hand, the pandemic put the spotlight on science, medicine and technology. On the other hand, it also brought to the forefront conspiracy theorists and those who do not believe in the progress of medicine and science in the first place. The pandemic also lead to an increased activity of the far right which connected to the anti-vaxxer movement and conspiracy theories.

Germany and the future chancellor: it’s complicated

Germany and the future chancellor: it’s complicated

Who will be Germany’s next chancellor? Olaf Scholz, the Social-Democrat candidate, seems to be the favorite choice. And it wouldn’t be far from the truth either, if the German election system weren’t so intricate. Now, after the September 26 election, all options are still on the table.

Ionuț Iamandi

09 Nov 2021
Ionuț Iamandi

6 minutes read
  • The summit on climate change, COP26, brings no breaking news: we already know that a critical point has been reached. However, just knowing it doesn't help. We need urgent measures and policies that can no longer be postponed if we want to give future generations a chance.
  • “This is not a time for words, but a time for action”, said Queen Elisabeth of Great Britain, born at a time when the air was still clean and people were still oblivious to the notion of “ppm”. By continuing to burn fossil fuels, “the world is digging its own grave”, UN Secretary General António Guterres also said. British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, the host of the meeting in Glasgow, said that “the world is one minute to midnight”.
  • The harsh reality is that the effect of the CO2 build-up in our atmosphere had a crucial contribution to the climatic changes we’ve noticed in recent years. The most dramatic of these is “global warming”, something which entails, among other things, modifications in natural habitats, extreme weather phenomena, the melting of polar ice caps or the rise in ocean levels. The stake of every COP is to determine governments and large corporations to abandon their CO2-emitting industries, so that the average temperature on Earth should not exceed the preindustrial era reference level by more than 1.5 Centigrade.
  • There are different sides to this quintessentially ecological problem. Politics prevails in Europe and America. In Asia, economy comes first. The Americans didn’t pick another “climate change denialist” such as former president Donald Trump as their representative in the climate conference. Nor has his successor been consistent in his attitude. For instance, over 40 countries made a pledge in Glasgow to eliminate their coal-based energy output in the near future. The United States was however not on the list, although one might have expected as much. In this respect, Joe Biden’s position seems to be much closer to the Trump administration rather than Barack Obama, who introduced measures restricting mining activities.
The gas bucket challenge: how the Russians and the oppositions have turned the energy crisis in the Republic of Moldova to their own benefit
The gas bucket challenge: how the Russians and the oppositions have turned the energy crisis in the Republic of Moldova to their own benefit

The social media in the Republic of Moldova has been flooded these days by a surging number of pictures of gas bills people uploaded once the energy price rises hit the market. The price hikes and the energy crisis are real, but Moscow and the Moldovan opposition are using them to undermine the pro-European government and its line of reforms.

Mădălin Necșuțu
Mădălin Necșuțu
17 Jan 2022
The crisis in Ukraine: why a war is not to Russia’s advantage
The crisis in Ukraine: why a war is not to Russia’s advantage

NATO's refusal to accept Russia's latest demands against the background of the crisis in Ukraine has heightened fears that Moscow is preparing for war. It is a possible scenario, but one that would be extremely costly for Russia, even if it wins the fighting on the ground.

Cătălin Gomboș
Cătălin Gomboș
16 Jan 2022
What could Moldovans learn about the “Eastern vector” from the crisis in Kazakhstan
What could Moldovans learn about the “Eastern vector” from the crisis in Kazakhstan

The crisis in Kazakhstan might persuade Moldovans, once and forever, that the model proposed by Russia in its sphere of influence is bound to fail, and that that they need to stop oscillating between the “Eastern” and Western vectors.

Mădălin Necșuțu
Mădălin Necșuțu
10 Jan 2022
The Djokovic Scandal: a tale of politicians, anti-vaxxers and Serb nationalists
The Djokovic Scandal: a tale of politicians, anti-vaxxers and Serb nationalists

The Djokovic scandal goes beyond sports or health policies. It is also an episode in Australia's internal political disputes and a pretext for self-victimization by anti-vaxxers and Serbian nationalists.

Vuk Velebit
Vuk Velebit
07 Jan 2022