“Trick or treat” – Lukashenko is trying to play old games with the West

“Trick or treat” – Lukashenko is trying to play old games with the West

On July 3, 2024, a hot midweek summer day just at the peak of vacation season was blown up by a breaking news in all Belarusian independent media: 18 of the country’s estimated 1500 political prisoners had been released. The most famous among them were Ryhor Kastusiou (long-time opposition politician), Daria Losik (wife of the famous blogger Ihar Losik, who is also a political prisoner), journalist Dzmitry Lukša, his wife, Palina, and Tamara Astrejka, a mother of four. The July 3 act was followed by several more “waves” of releasing political prisoners, bringing the total number, as of today, to 115 people were freed.

As Belarus is feeling the bite of Western sanctions, it seems that the Lukashenko regime is trying to improve relations with the West by “trading out” some political prisoners. Some in the Belarus opposition feel that the West should make some concessions if that would lead to the release of more prisoners. Others reject such a move, saying that if Lukashenko is releasing prisoners, that means that the pressure on the regime is working.

Exchanging political prisoners for bonuses for Lukashenko

Just after the first political prisoners were released, some politicians and human rights defenders stated that this is Lukashenko’s “sign of a good will” or even “the act of humanism”: he is making the first step to start the negotiation with the West about the normalisation of relations, so it is necessary to give something in return in order to continue the dialogue and try to free more Belarusian political prisoners. For example, Andrey Yahorau, former speaker of the Coordination Council of Belarus, on August 3, 2024, during the Conference of New Belarus in Vilnius stated that “I would recognize the legitimacy, in a certain sense, of what is happening in Belarus. I would welcome the presence of, for example, European ambassadors in Belarus, if this allows for the release of political prisoners en masse and moves the situation in Belarus towards a more favourable one for the activities of civil society”.

Basically this means that it is high time to start negotiations with the Lukashenko regime in order to achieve the release of political prisoners. According to this view, it is necessary to persuade Western politicians to lift sanctions from the Lukashenko regime in exchange for the release of political prisoners. The fact that most sanctions were imposed because of the support of the Minsk dictator for the           Russian aggression against Ukraine, the acts of air piracy and staging hybrid attacks on Poland, Lithuania and Latvia, isn’t taken into consideration here.

It is interesting that some representatives of Belarusian democratic forces use the exchange of Kremlin spies to political prisoners in Russia on August 1, 2024 as a success story of the Western politicians and Russian opposition’s lobbying, which should be used as an example by the Belarusian politicians now. For example, Tatsiana Khomich, the sister of Maria Kalesnikava (the member of Viktar Babaryka’s team and subsequently one of the leaders of Coordination Council of Belarus, a political prisoner, sentenced to 11 years in prison) even stated that there was a theoretical possibility to include Belarusians in this exchange: “Even if this exchange is a joint operation of the special services to return valuable agents and their citizens home, the question remains: why were more than ten Russian political prisoners included in it and Belarusians were not included? Belarus, apparently, participated in this complex exchange, given that a German citizen has been held hostage there since October 2023. The parties were the United States, Norway and Poland, which are long-standing partners of the democratic forces of Belarus. They had the opportunity to include Belarusians in the exchange, not to mention Germany. In my opinion, one of the reasons why this did not happen is that the issue of their release was not a priority for Western partners. Communication with the slogans “no trade in political prisoners”, “no negotiations with the regime” and “first release everyone – then negotiations and new elections” did not bring the desired result”.

So the narrative “we need to persuade the West to give something to Lukashneka in order to trade out the release of other political prisoners” got on the agenda of Belarusian political life. Russian opposition politician Ilya Yashin stated that, according to his sources, Lukashenko released political prisoners in exchange for spare parts for Belavia aircraft: “As I was told, he [Lukashenko] is literally exchanging people for parts for planes. He has problems with Belavia, and he needs to repair the planes, but he cannot get the necessary parts because of sanctions. He is literally exchanging living people for parts for planes. But it is clear that he will not exchange Maria Kalesnikava, nor Siarhei Tsikhanouski, nor Viktar Babaryka for any parts. Well, then let Putin put pressure on him. They will sort it out later”. Indeed, aircraft spare parts are subject to the Western sanctions, so the state airways company Belavia experiences big problems with servicing its fleet, mostly consisting of Western aircraft. However, no proof of these words was found and Yashin never named his sources.

The Lukashenko regime is signaling a willingness to work with the West, which means that it is starting to feel the bite of the Western sanctions

It is interesting to note that this rhetoric almost completely coincides with the messages disseminated by the Lukashenko regime propaganda. For example, Jury Vaskrasienski, formerly a member of Viktar Babaryka’s team and now the head of “Round table of democratic forces” – a fake puppet organisation existing for promotion of negotiation between Lukashenko and the West, is promoting this “exchange scheme”. On October 2, 2024, in his discussion with former political prisoner and human rights defender Leanid Sudalenka he said that Lukashenko is waiting for the West to make some concessions to the regime in Minsk after the release of political prisoners: “Such “big prisoners” will be exchanged for “big offers”. For example, opening airspace, lifting sanctions on industrial enterprises. We were waiting for a treat. There are no treats – releases are no longer being considered”.

The most interesting piece of this kind is the article in the main propaganda newspaper of the regime, Sovetskaya Belorussiya, by Lukashenko’s minister of foreign affairs Maksim Ryžankou. In his op-ed, Ryžankou is trying to persuade Lithuanians that their country is suffering because of the sanctions imposed on the Lukashenko regime: “The annual direct losses of the Lithuanian economy from the severance of ties with Belarus are estimated at almost 1 billion dollars. And this is not the limit! The most significant consequences include: a catastrophic blow to the transit industry of Lithuania, the work of the Klaipeda port and Lithuanian Railways, a reduction in Lithuanian exports, a sharp deterioration in the economic situation of enterprises working in cooperation with Belarusian partners in various industries, losses in the tourism business”. However, this should be understood exactly the opposite way: “the Lukashenko regime badly suffers from the absence of access to Lithuanian market and ports, so we want to negotiate that”.

But what is more important, Ryžankou begs for the recognition of the Lukashenko regime and starting negotiation with it: “Minsk has repeatedly conveyed to the Lithuanian side its readiness for consultations with Vilnius on restoring normal good-neighbourly interaction. We are ready to resume contacts through border and special services, industry departments, and foreign ministries. We can begin work with parliamentarians, any authorised Lithuanian delegations. We are ready to develop a roadmap for unblocking cooperation in certain areas, naturally, on the principles of respect for the sovereignty and independence of Belarus and its right to its own path of development in cooperation with partners”.

“Trick or treat” by Lukashenko not possible any more

So, as we see, the Minsk strongman started his very old game of “trick or treat”, which he played successfully in 2010 and 2015: I will take my own citizens hostage in order to exchange them for some bonuses for me in the future. However, the scale of brutality against the 2020 protesters, and the support given for Russia in its war against Ukraine made this game impossible to be repeated this time around.

Pavieł Łatuška, the head of the National Anti-crisis management of Belarus and a member of the United Transitional Cabited of Belarus argues that it is the pressure on the regime (including sanctions and attempts to issue order for Lukashenko’s arrest by International Criminal Court) that makes it release the political prisoners and look for help from outside the country: “Our priority has always been and will always be the freedom, life and health of every political prisoner. At the same time, behind the screen of “pardons,” it is important not to lose sight of the fact that, according to human rights activists, repressions have only increased in recent months, with new political prisoners ending up in the dictator’s prisons… Lukashenko “pardoned” illegally convicted people. But we must not forget that he had no right to imprison them. We must not stop pressuring until all political prisoners are released”.

Speaking about the scale of repression, Łatuška here is quite right. The head of BYSOL foundation Andrej Stryžak reported that the number of people, requiring aid because of political repression inside Belarus, has only increased since the first release of political prisoners in July 2024. According to Belarusian human rights activists, throughout the time when 115 political prisoners were released (from July 3 to September 16, 2024), 142 people were recognised political prisoners. So it is just impossible to say that the repressions in Belarus are decreasing. Vice versa, more and more people are being arrested for political reasons.

For now, Lukashenko’s regime is sticking to what it does best.

Other opinions
The fall of Syria, a major defeat to the Tehran – Moscow axis

The fall of Syria, a major defeat to the Tehran – Moscow axis

A key piece in the so-called "axis of resistance" built in recent decades by Iran has fallen. Russia loses its most important Arab ally in the Middle East. The future of Syria, uncertain. Risk of regional war.

It’s official: Călin Georgescu’s campaign has Russia written all over it

It’s official: Călin Georgescu’s campaign has Russia written all over it

Declassified documents presented by Romanian intelligence prove that Călin Georgescu is supported by a state actor. The state in question is not named, but its actions are similar to operations previously carried out by Russia.

Why did Romanian citizens in Moldova vote differently than the diaspora elsewhere in the West?

Why did Romanian citizens in Moldova vote differently than the diaspora elsewhere in the West?

Pro-European right-wing parties in Romania grabbed large numbers of votes in Moldova, while the Romanian diaspora opted for sovereigntist forces. Experts believe that sovereigntists were rejected because they are hostile to Ukraine.

EBOOK> Razboi si propaganda: O cronologie a conflictului ruso-ucrainean

EBOOK>Razboiul lui Putin cu lumea libera: Propaganda, dezinformare, fake news

More
Reactions in Ukraine after the parliamentary election: Romania recovers from TikTok shock
Reactions in Ukraine after the parliamentary election: Romania recovers from TikTok shock

Ukrainian observers have noted that Romania remains pro-European, while the risk remains that, if elected, president Georgescu might turn the country into a state similar to Orban's Hungary.

Marin Gherman
02 Dec 2024
Dangerous Liaisons: Disinfo in Bulgaria Increasingly Targets Culture and Education
Dangerous Liaisons: Disinfo in Bulgaria Increasingly Targets Culture and Education

A far-right protest in Sofia against a XIX century play directed by John Malkovich brought to the spotlight the disinformation and propaganda campaign targeting Bulgaria’s culture and education.

Are Latvians getting weary of Ukrainian refugees?
Are Latvians getting weary of Ukrainian refugees?

Ukrainian refugees in Latvia have generally been well received, but there were also some displays of hostility. Experts warn a long-term integration program is needed for the refugees.

In Estonian politics, a battle for Narva has begun
In Estonian politics, a battle for Narva has begun

Although Russia is a threat to Estonia, Russian speakers here have voted for pro-Russian politicians in the legislative elections. They now want to win the main Russian-speaking city, Narva, in the local elections.

Călin Georgescu: A
Călin Georgescu: A "back-up" prime minister, an admirer of the legionnaires, hostile to NATO and the EU

Georgescu was once considered a technocrat with a solid international career. When that career ended, he adopted a pro-Russian and anti-Western discourse and expressed his admiration for Ion Antonescu and Corneliu Zelea Codreanu.

Cezar Manu
25 Nov 2024
Poland as a Frontline Target in Russia’s Growing Sabotage Campaign
Poland as a Frontline Target in Russia’s Growing Sabotage Campaign

Against the background of the war in Ukraine, Russia is stepping up hybrid attacks against NATO countries. Being at the forefront of Russia’s campaign, Poland has been facing an increasing number of sabotages.