Donations
Veridica.md
The recently proposed Belarusian budget for 2025, now under parliamentary review, has brought to light a pressing concern: the deepening economic dependence on Russia. This issue, long suspected but rarely addressed publicly, has been openly acknowledged by the Belarusian Finance Minister, who admitted that the significant budgetary shortfall for the coming year will be covered by direct Russian financial support. This dependency has been a consistent feature of Belarus’ economic landscape, but what’s new is the candid way it’s now being discussed—not as a vulnerability, but rather as a demonstration of the strengths of Belarus’ current political and economic strategy. However, beneath this narrative, the illusion of Belarusian economic sovereignty seems to be eroding rapidly.
The Scope of Economic Dependency
Belarus' economic reliance on Russia is hardly a new phenomenon. Scholars and analysts, both from state-affiliated institutions and independent circles, have consistently studied this relationship, quantifying Russian support to Belarus at several billion dollars annually. This assistance is provided through a variety of channels: direct loans, subsidies, favorable energy deals, and easier access to the Russian market, all of which reduce transaction costs for Belarusian businesses.
What is becoming increasingly clear, however, is that this dependency has reached a tipping point. It is no longer merely an economic reliance, but one that extends into the political sphere. Since 2020, when the Belarusian government narrowly survived mass protests following a disputed election, Russian political, economic, and military support has ensured the regime’s survival. As a result, Belarus' ability to make independent decisions, both domestically and in its foreign policy, has been severely constrained.
The Political Dimension
The events of 2020 were a watershed moment for Belarusian-Russian relations. Russia’s backing of the embattled regime in Minsk—politically, economically, and militarily—marked the point where Belarus' dependence on Russia ceased being simply an economic matter. The Russian government's intervention guaranteed the survival of the Belarusian leadership, but at a cost: political autonomy.
While Belarus retains some room for maneuver in economic and political matters, it does so only within limits deemed acceptable by Moscow. The Kremlin has strategically positioned itself to maintain influence without micromanaging every aspect of Belarusian governance. However, the major contours of Belarus' political and economic direction are now aligned with Russian interests.
This heightened level of Belarus' dependence on Russia has never been more apparent, manifesting clearly across a range of socio-economic dimensions: from the tax and budgetary policies to financial and economic structures, and even extending into the realm of socio-political life.
Budgetary Dependence: The 2025 Budget as a Case Study
The 2025 republican budget has laid bare the extent of Belarus' economic reliance on Russia. Faced with a deficit of over a billion dollars, the Belarusian Finance Ministry has openly stated that it intends to plug this gap through Russian financial support. What is striking is the lack of discussion about alternative strategies—there is no mention of reforms, economic diversification, or boosting domestic efficiency.
This points to a fundamental issue: the current economic model has run its course. For years, Belarus has relied on a mix of state control and Russian subsidies to sustain growth, but this approach is now doing more harm than good. Real structural changes would likely require political reform, but that is off the table for the current regime, which sees its primary goal as securing resources to maintain the status quo.
While Russian support is officially categorized as "non-repayable aid" in budgetary documents, it is clear that this support comes with strings attached. Political loyalty is the least of these conditions. Russia has increasingly asked for concessions from Belarus in exchange for its financial backing, leading to greater Russian influence over various aspects of Belarusian governance. This influence is most visible in areas like security, where Russian private military contractors operate freely within Belarus, and in tax policy, where Belarus is gradually harmonizing its systems with Russian practices.
The Economic Fallout of Supporting Russia’s Military Actions
Belarus’ increasing dependence on Russia has dragged it into controversial international waters, most notably through its tacit support of Russia's military actions in Ukraine. Belarus’ alignment with Russia in this conflict has resulted in severe economic consequences, particularly in its trade relations with Western countries, which once accounted for up to a third of Belarus’ external trade.
In a single stroke, Belarus has lost access to key Western markets. Worse still, its remaining trade partners outside of Russia—the so-called "third countries"—are now accessible only through Russian territory. This has further deepened Belarus’ reliance on its eastern neighbor, as even its non-Russian trade is now subject to Moscow’s good will. Most Belarusian exports are now either sold directly to Russia or pass through Russian infrastructure, making Belarus vulnerable to any changes in Russia’s internal policies or external relations.
A key indicator of this dependency is the Belarusian ruble’s correlation with oil prices—a paradox, given that Belarus is not an oil producer. However, because Belarus refines Russian oil and because its currency is tied to the Russian ruble, which is itself linked to global oil prices, fluctuations in the global oil market have a direct impact on Belarus’ economy.
Socio-political Repercussions
The political landscape in Belarus is starkly divided into two eras: before 2020 and after. Prior to the 2020 election, there was a semblance of political diversity, with some degree of civil society activity and limited opposition. All of that disappeared after the crackdown that followed the mass protests. Most independent NGOs were shut down, and any cooperation with international organizations, including those focused on apolitical areas like environmental protection or support for vulnerable groups, was effectively halted.
What remains is a shell of civil society, populated only by pro-government organizations, which exist primarily to simulate a functioning third sector. These state-aligned groups are tasked with implementing policies dictated from above, rather than responding to genuine societal needs. The inefficacy of these groups is becoming increasingly apparent, particularly in areas like environmental protection and social welfare, where NGOs once played a critical role. Faced with mounting pressure to address these issues, the Belarusian government has been forced to allow limited international cooperation to resume, particularly in the most urgent sectors.
Conclusion: Passing the Buck to Future Generations
Belarus' growing economic dependence on Russia is a ticking time bomb. The current regime seems to be playing a game of political hot potato, passing on the country’s economic and political problems to future generations of leaders. By relying on Russian support to patch up its budgetary shortfalls, the government is delaying the inevitable: a reckoning with the unsustainable nature of its economic model.
In the short term, this strategy may provide some breathing room. But in the long term, it is setting up Belarus for a crisis that will be difficult to resolve without significant political and economic upheaval. By kicking the can down the road, the current leadership is not solving problems—it is merely postponing them, hoping that the burden of reform will fall on the shoulders of future administrations.
For the current regime, this approach has two major advantages. First, it allows them to avoid confronting hard truths now, adopting the "I'll think about it tomorrow" attitude famously espoused by Scarlett O’Hara in Gone with the Wind. Second, when the problems finally do come to a head, today’s leaders will be able to point to the relative stability of their tenure and blame future governments for failing to manage the crisis—conveniently ignoring the fact that the roots of that crisis were planted by their own policies.
The illusion of Belarusian sovereignty is fading faster by the day as the country becomes ever more entangled in Russia’s economic and political web. For other nations, Belarus serves as a clear example of how excessive economic dependence can ultimately lead to the loss of political agency. At the same time, for the pro-democratic Belarusian forces in exile, this growing entrapment poses a formidable challenge that they will inevitably have to face.
---copie-image.webp)
