Anti-Covid vaccines caused 74% of sudden deaths worldwide, according to a staunch anti-vaccine doctor, quoted by conspiracy theorists.
NEWS: I don't believe such nonsense,. especially when it comes from the most published doctor in US medical history.
The largest post-vaccine study ever conducted shows that 73.9% of sudden deaths were caused by vaccines (over 300 bodies). This may still be called a “conspiracy theory,” but the data is there, right in front of us.
The problem is not just a short-term issue. Studies also confirm that heart and brain deteriorate significantly over time in those who receive the vaccine. It is imperative that we actively detoxify ourselves.
Write “DETOX” in the comment section below and we will send you a message telling you what we use to detox ourselves naturally on a daily basis (look for our notifications / notification requests)
NARRATIVE: Covid vaccines have caused almost three quarters of sudden deaths worldwide.
PURPOSE: To promote conspiracy rhetoric, to undermine trust in the healthcare system and, by extension, in state authorities, to stir and amplify social unrest, to validate previously promoted conspiracy theories.
A conspiracy doctor’s study, unvalidated by the scientific community
WHY THE NARRATIVE IS FALSE: The study’s authors, under the coordination of Dr. Peter A. McCullough, are known for their opposition to public policies regarding vaccination, and their work is published in journals with weak or non-existent independent review. The study was published in November 2024, but McCullough had presented his “conclusions” as early as April 2021, when he told an interview to The New American, the magazine of the far-right organization “John Birch Society”, that a large number of deaths are attributed to anti-Covid vaccines.
Originally published in the pages of PubMed, the article was withdrawn after a significant number of members of the scientific community expressed concerns about its accuracy. Their concerns included improper citation of references, inadequate investigative methodology, and intentional or unintentional errors, coupled with misrepresentations and a lack of factual arguments for conclusions. Also, without providing any arguments, the study a priori rejected evidence and studies that refuted its conclusions. Several independent reviewers stated that the report had “selection bias”, for instance autopsies performed without a comparable control group (unvaccinated) or cases reported voluntarily.
The journal that published the study, Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law, is known in academic circles as lacking the hallmarks of a legitimate scientific publication. It is not listed in major scientific databases (such as PubMed or Scopus). It does not have a reliable editorial board, nor does it adhere to traditional quality control measures. Furthermore, the studies it publishes, which are over-cited by wellness and alternative medicine influencers (as is the present case), are methodologically flawed to such extents, that they never pass peer reviews and are never published in a reputable scientific journal.
In addition, the effectiveness of the anti-Covid vaccination program, which has saved millions of lives worldwide, has been demonstrated by countless scientifically validated studies at global level. One such study, cited by University of Cambridge, which involved almost the entire adult population of England, showed that the incidence of heart attacks and strokes was lower after the anti-Covid vaccination than before or in unvaccinated people. Published in Nature Communications, the study showed that the incidence of arterial thrombosis, such as heart attacks and strokes, was up to 10% lower in the period between 13 and 24 weeks after the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. After a second dose, the incidence was up to 27% lower after the AstraZeneca vaccine and up to 20% lower after the Pfizer/Biotech vaccine.
The study in question was conducted by the Universities of Cambridge, Bristol and Edinburgh and was certified by the British Heart Foundation. Within its framework, researchers analyzed anonymous health records of 46 million adults in England, between December 8, 2020 and January 23, 2022.
Medicine, the greatest enemy of conspiracy theorists
BACKGROUND: False narratives regarding the efficiency and effects of vaccination have been circulating for several years, but have become much more visible after the development of anti-Covid vaccines. Thus, real anti-vaccine movements have emerged in many countries, strongly influenced by some of these narratives, which they take over, internalize and amplify. They fit into a broader context, which speaks of the existence of a secretive plan (the Great Health Reset) at global level, designed to reduce the planet's population and/or control it entirely.
Several conservative publications and conspiracy theorists take up these false narratives and seek, over time, to validate their anti-vaccine theories through pseudo-experts, anonymous websites, or by falsely citing various studies, events, or personalities from outside the medical world. Veridica has already debunked several fake news and disinformation narratives about vaccines, which either insert nanobots into the human body to obtain total control, or cause sterility across three generations and mental illness, reduce the life expectancy of men by 24 years, or cause physical disabilities, testicular cancer, myocarditis, and even death in those who took the jab.
---copie-image.webp)
