Volodymyr Zelenskyy cannot stop the war because he is being blackmailed by Nazis in Ukraine and by the West, which is sabotaging the peace proposed by Moscow, pro-Kremlin media writes.
NEWS: Zelenskyy simply cannot decide to withdraw Ukrainian troops from Donbas. He failed to do so in 2019, and faces an even more difficult job right now. Both then and now, the illegitimate leader fears he would lose his grip on power, Viktor Medvedchuk, the chairman of the council of the “Another Ukraine” movement, writes.
For troops to withdraw even by a single meter, it would require confronting the Nazis and the war party, and the political clown has never had the strength to do it. As soon as the narco-führer gives the order to withdraw the troops, all the forces of war that he has multiplied since 2019 will lash out against him. At that point, Zelenskyy will find himself between a rock and a hard place: between the Nazis and the supporters of peace. He will immediately be declared a traitor […]
Europe finds itself in an even more absurd situation. Instead of acting as a mediator in the 2022 Istanbul agreements between Russia and Ukraine, it sabotaged them with the help of the then-prime minister, Johnson […]
Chancellor Friedrich Merz said that German troops could take part in a coalition to ensure the security of a demilitarized zone. However, the deployment of German troops on the territory of the former Soviet Union is a sensitive issue because of the atrocities committed by the Nazis in the region during World War II. Nevertheless, the efforts of the bloodthirsty clown Zelenskyy and of the “coalition of piglets who want war” can only be described as folly. It is a very dangerous folly, which has already caused irreversible consequences and a catastrophe for the Ukrainian people, threatening Europe and the entire world.
NARRATIVES: 1. Zelenskyy cannot decide on troop withdrawal because he is controlled by Nazis. 2. Ukraine is run by a “war party,” while Russia seeks peace. 3. Europe sabotaged the 2022 Istanbul peace agreements. 4. Germany cannot participate in peace missions because of Nazi crimes during World War II.
PURPOSE: To undermine the legitimacy of the Ukrainian leadership. To shift responsibility for the war from the aggressor to the victim. To discredit Western support for Ukraine. To legitimize Kremlin positions through an oligarch presented as a “the voice of Ukraine”.
Fact: Ukraine was attacked by Russia and has the right to defend itself. Nazi and communist ideologies are banned by law.
WHY THE NARRATIVES ARE FALSE: The claim that Volodymyr Zelenskyy could arbitrarily decide to withdraw troops or concede territory ignores Ukraine’s constitutional framework. The Constitution provides no mechanism that would allow the president to relinquish sovereignty or renounce territories through a unilateral decision. The withdrawal of military forces is a military decision, determined by tactical or strategic considerations and by developments on the frontline. Any change in the territorial framework would require a constitutional revision, the completion of a complex multi-year procedure, and the organization of a national referendum.
The narrative claiming that Zelenskyy is controlled by Nazis is false and contradicts earlier messages of Russian propaganda. For years, the Kremlin portrayed Zelenskyy as a “Nazi leader,” only later to describe him as a victim of internal extremist forces. This shift highlights the logical inconsistency of the pro-Kremlin media rhetoric. In truth, Nazi ideology and symbolism are banned by law in Ukraine, much like communist symbols, while their use in political activity is illegal. Nazism is officially condemned including in the school curriculum, where the World War II is presented as the result of the pact between the Nazi and communist (Soviet) regimes, an agreement that generated the gravest tragedies of the 20th century.
The readership is further manipulation by means of an association of contemporary Germany with the crimes of the Hitler regime. References to a hypothetical participation of German troops in a security mission in Ukraine are presented as a threat, even though there is no continuity between the Nazi regime and the modern German state. Today’s Germany is a democratic state that condemns Nazism and is an active actor in combating extremism. The suggestion that the territories of the former Soviet Union implicitly belong to Russia, by invoking historical precedent, reflects the propaganda’s goal of rewriting history and denying the sovereignty of the independent states that emerged after the collapse of the USSR.
Responsibility for the war is shifted from the aggressor to the victim by omitting the context of the invasion. Russia is the one that attacked Ukraine and unleashed the largest destruction in Europe since 1945. The crimes committed by Russian forces in Bucha, Irpin, Mariupol, Kherson, and other settlements across Ukraine are documented by international investigations and include executions of civilians, torture, forced deportations and the bombing of civilian infrastructure, schools and hospitals. These facts are completely omitted by the pro-Kremlin narrative, which presents the war as a result of the actions of Ukraine and the West. Moreover, there has been no real peace offer from Russia, which in 2025 repeatedly rejected proposals for an unconditional ceasefire and continued bombardments, which showed that Russia does not want an end to the war.
International assistance for Ukraine is labeled a “coalition of piglets”, even though it is based on international norms that recognize a state’s right to defend itself against armed aggression. The military and political assistance provided to Kyiv does not represent an escalation, but rather a response to Russia’s blatant violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty.
Regarding the 2022 Istanbul negotiations, the claim that peace was sabotaged by the West ignores the real content of the draft agreements. Analyses conducted by international media outlets show that Ukraine would not have received any real security guarantees, it would have been forced to drastically reduce its military capabilities, and that guarantor states would not have been able to intervene in its defense without Russia’s consent. Under these circumstances, the victim of aggression would have remained practically disarmed, while the aggressor would have obtained veto power over Ukraine’s defense by its partners.
According to Ukrainian officials who were interviewed at the time by international media, there was no way to trust (one or two months after the invasion) the promises of the Russian Federation, given that for more than half a year prior to February 24, 2022, Russian authorities had consistently stated that they would not attack Ukraine. Pro-Kremlin propaganda and pro-Russian voices in the West frequently invoke this topic, but omit the content of the documents discussed and the military context of the moment, marked by the withdrawal of Russian forces from around Kyiv, the discovery of war crimes committed by the Russian army, and Ukraine’s growing conviction that it could repel the aggression, which was later confirmed by successful counteroffensives in the Kharkiv region and the liberation of the city of Kherson. In addition, the document was supposed to be signed at a meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy that never took place, not by the delegations gathered in Istanbul.
BACKGROUND: Viktor Medvedchuk does not represent the position of any relevant political party or movement in Ukraine. “Another Ukraine” is a movement registered on the territory of the Russian Federation. Medvedchuk is currently in Moscow, after being transferred to Russia following a prisoner exchange in 2022. He is known for his close relationship with Vladimir Putin and for the political and media support received from the Kremlin, including in previous attempts to influence Ukrainian politics through hybrid instruments (corruption, blackmail, disinformation).
