Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube LinkedIn

Fake News

FAKE NEWS: The ECHR acknowledges that the Crimean Peninsula belongs to Russia

Crimeea
©Anton Holoborodko - http://www.ex.ua/76677715, wikimedia.org  |   „Omuleți verzi” capturând Crimeea
False
True

The ECHR has acknowledged that the Crimean Peninsula belongs to Russia, writes the Russian press, taking out of context a court decision by which Moscow is assigned legal responsibility for what has happened on the peninsula since its annexation, including possible war crimes.

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled on January 14 this year that the complaint filed by Ukraine against Russia over the annexation of Crimea in 2014 is “partially admissible”, and a decision on the merits of the case is to be taken at a later date. According to the Court in Strasbourg, Russia has indeed exercised effective control over Crimea, as evidenced by the "size and strength of the increased Russian military presence" in the Ukrainian peninsula. The Ukrainian Foreign Ministry and the Ukrainian press have stated that the ECHR's decision was a victory for Kiev and a recognition of the illegal nature of Moscow's annexation of the peninsula. On the other hand, the Russian press sought to present a diametrically opposed interpretation, headlining that, in fact, the ECHR recognized Russia's right to control Crimea.

NEWS: The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that, since February 27, 2014, Crimea has been "de facto under Russian jurisdiction." At the same time, the court did not indicate whether the annexation of the peninsula was legal from the point of view of international law. The decision was made during the examination of the Ukrainian complaint on Crimea. The court intends to continue working on the matter but has already found that some elements in Kiev's appeal have not been substantiated.

"The Court found that there was sufficient evidence for it to conclude that Russia had exercised effective control over Crimea in the period in dispute between the parties, namely from 27 February to 18 March 2014. Both sides agree that Russia has controlled Crimea after that period, but their positions differ”, the ECHR said in a press release on the case involving Russia and Ukraine.

According to Ukraine, Russia has "de facto control" over the territory of Crimea, while the Russian Federation claims that the court cannot rule on the ownership of the peninsula, as territorial disputes fall outside the jurisdiction of the ECHR. The court did not examine Crimea's legal affiliation [….]

In the court's view, Ukraine has provided sufficient evidence to allege human rights violations in Crimea. In particular, the ECHR considers some reports of repression of the non-Russian press, the banning of rallies and protests, the unreasonable detention and the persecution of Crimean Tatars.

At the same time, the court rejected some of the points on Ukraine’s complaint, considering them unconfirmed. The ECHR did not accept charges of killing civilians, detaining and intimidating journalists, discriminating against ethnic Ukrainians and politically motivated prosecutions.

NARRATIVES: 1. Ukraine has no clear evidence that Russia has illegally annexed Crimea. 2. Crimea is naturally under Russian jurisdiction. 3. The ECHR cannot rule on territorial disputes. 4. Crimea became an integral part of Russia following a popular referendum, in which the majority of the population voted for the transfer of jurisdiction to Moscow

CONTEXT / LOCAL ETHOS: Crimea became a “de facto” part of Russia in March 2014 following a referendum, held without international observers and under pressure from the Russian army, in which 95.6% of participants were in favor of joining the Russian Federation. The unification was carried out, according to norms of international, following an annexation. The referendum was rejected by most countries, including the United States, the EU members, Australia, Canada and Japan. On the other hand, Afghanistan, Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua, Syria, Kazakhstan and North Korea consider the peninsula as being Russian. The Minsk authorities recognized Crimea as "de facto" part of Russia. Russia's annexation of the Ukrainian peninsula in 2014 was followed by an armed conflict with pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine, which has carried on until this very day, despite numerous armistices, and has resulted in nearly 13,000 deaths, according to UN figures. Ukraine has turned to a number of international organizations and institutions with complaints against Russia. In most cases, the things are in Kiev’s favor. Russia seeks to cover up both the actions undertaken to annex Crimea and its involvement in the Donbass war and uses fake news and disinformation to do so.

PURPOSE: To preserve and increase the confidence of Russian citizens in the Kremlin by furthering the idea that the annexation of Crimea to Russia was done correctly, and the international community is beginning to recognize this fact. The Russian media have taken out of context some sentences from the official ECHR communiqué, formulating headlines that are not related to the Court's stand. Another goal is to convince Russian-speaking readers in the former Soviet states that the EU and the US narratives regarding the illegality of Crimea’s annexation are false.

WHY THE NARRATIVES ARE FALSE: The ECHR has stated that Crimea has been under Russian jurisdiction since 2014, which means that Moscow might be responsible for the crimes committed there. The court, in fact, admitted Ukraine's complaints, following Russia's de facto trial. The ECHR does not examine territorial disputes in this case, but has established the party responsible for human rights violations on the peninsula. Assigning responsibility for the forces controlling an occupied territory is a current international practice, which by no means entails the recognition of jurisdiction over the territory.

GRAIN OF TRUTH: The ECHR said in the communique that the deployment of Russian troops in Crimea took place without the consent of the Ukrainian authorities and in the absence of "any element suggesting that a threat would target Russian troops stationed in Crimea." The ECHR noted that it had not been asked to establish "whether the integration of Crimea, under Russian law, into the Russian Federation was legal in terms of international law." The Russian press wrote that the ECHR did not say whether the annexation of Crimea to Russia was legal but did not mention that it was not asked to do so.

OFFICIAL REACTIONS: Ukraine's Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba described the European Court of Human Rights' decision to recognize Ukraine's case against Russia "partially admissible" as a "victory for Ukraine". "It is, of course, a victory for Ukraine. It is an important step towards bringing Russia to justice for its aggression against Ukraine. And with each step, the price of this responsibility will increase. I am convinced that Ukraine's legal set of actions will gradually confirm the truth that Ukraine has reported since 2014 and will reject all the propaganda and disinformation that Russia has spread, " Kuleba said.

Carte recomandata
  • Publication / Media:
    Lenta.ru, Ria.ru, Daily Storm
  • Date of publication:
    14/01/2021
  • Language / Target audience:
    readers from the ex-USSR region, which Russia considers its backyard
  • Amplification:
    The social media, radio and TV stations
  • Political affiliation:
    the Kremlin
  • Key narrative:
    The ECHR acknowledges that the Crimean Peninsula belongs to Russia
Other articles
FAKE NEWS: Ukrainians want peace, but Zelensky wants a war with Russia

FAKE NEWS: Ukrainians want peace, but Zelensky wants a war with Russia

Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, wants to go to war with Russia, while Ukrainian society wants peace, the Russian state media writes, rehashing a number of false narratives about the conflict in Donbass. The narratives are based on certain user comments critical of the Ukrainian president on the social media accounts of the pro-Kremlin publication “Sharij.net”. Volodymyr Zelensky’s discourse on the need to create a powerful weapon in Europe was presented as a declaration of war.

FAKE NEWS: NATO wants to invade Kaliningrad and make money for American corporations

FAKE NEWS: NATO wants to invade Kaliningrad and make money for American corporations

NATO has an aggressive stance towards Russia and is training to invade the region of Kaliningrad. However, the real goal of the Alliance is to make money for the big American defense corporations, claims the Kremlin’s propaganda arm, Sputnik.

FAKE NEWS: NATO wants Moldovan troops to fight Russia in order to defend the United States’ interests

FAKE NEWS: NATO wants Moldovan troops to fight Russia in order to defend the United States’ interests

President Maia Sandu and NATO are discussing the participation of the Republic of Moldova in a possible military conflict against Russia to defend the interests of the United States, pravdorub.md writes. Washington wants to create an even bigger coalition made up of states from Eastern Europe, starting Ukraine and including the Baltic States, Poland and Romania. The narrative about Maia Sandu’s intention to involve the Republic of Moldova in an armed conflict against Russia, or to attack the breakaway region of Transnistria, has been increasingly used by Kremlin-linked media and the Party of Socialists, particularly ahead of the early election on Moldova.

Marin Gherman

19 Jan 2021
Marin Gherman

4 minutes read
  • The ECHR found "partially admissible" Ukraine's complaint against Russia after the annexation of Crimea in 2014. According to the Court, Russia has indeed exercised effective control over Crimea, as evidenced by "size and strength of the increased Russian military presence" in the Ukrainian peninsula.
  • NARRATIVES: 1. Ukraine has no clear evidence that Russia has illegally annexed Crimea. 2. Crimea is naturally under Russian jurisdiction. 3. The ECHR cannot rule on territorial disputes. 4. Crimea became an integral part of Russia following a popular referendum, in which the majority of the population voted for the transfer of jurisdiction to Moscow.
  • The ECHR does not examine territorial disputes in this case but has established the party responsible for human rights violations in the peninsula. Assigning responsibility for the forces controlling an occupied territory is a current international practice, which by no means entails the recognition of jurisdiction over the territory.
FAKE NEWS: Europeans call for the building of Nord Stream 3 and 4 to overcome the gas crisis
FAKE NEWS: Europeans call for the building of Nord Stream 3 and 4 to overcome the gas crisis

As the natural gas crisis is deepening and prices are rising in the EU member states, the Russian state press is promoting narratives about Europeans panicking and seeking Russia's help.

19 Oct 2021
FAKE NEWS: The PAS administration is draining Moldova’s agriculture of its workforce
FAKE NEWS: The PAS administration is draining Moldova’s agriculture of its workforce

The Republic of Moldova will remain without its workforce for the fruit and vegetable harvest this year after the signing of an agreement that will allow Moldovans to work in the farming sector in Germany, the pro-socialist news portal kp.md writes. The narrative is trying to undermine the country’s European aspirations: in fact, the agreement is merely trying legalize the situation of all the Moldovans who are seeking jobs in Germany.

Cornel Ciobanu
Cornel Ciobanu
18 Oct 2021
FAKE NEWS: Romania will deploy military forces under EU command to Crimea
FAKE NEWS: Romania will deploy military forces under EU command to Crimea

Romanian troops are expected to take part in Ukraine’s military operation aimed at retaking Crimea.

Mădălin Necșuțu
Mădălin Necșuțu
13 Oct 2021
FAKE NEWS: The UN denounced the crimes of the Zelenski regime in Ukraine
FAKE NEWS: The UN denounced the crimes of the Zelenski regime in Ukraine

The UN has criticized Kiev for serious human rights violations, noting, according to the Russian media, that Ukraine “kills its population”, “tortures” and “restricts freedom of speech”. In reality, the Russian press has tried to manipulate the public opinion by selectively using information from the report of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.

Marin Gherman
Marin Gherman
12 Oct 2021