Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube LinkedIn

Disinformation:

DISINFORMATION: The Russian minority in Moldova, under fire from the Constitutional Court and President Maia Sandu

Disinformation

“Everything that’s happened is a political move. It’s unfortunate. Russian speakers are numerous here, in the Republic of Moldova, and this decision virtually removes them from the social sphere, they are being cast out”, Socialist MP Nicolae Pascaru told Noi.md.

“Russian speakers who voted for PAS (Party for Action and Solidarity), will now see the effects of their choice. Before the election, Maia Sandu spoke Russian beautifully, but now she has turned her back on them”, Pascaru went on to say.

On its Facebook page, Aid.md posted a video of Maia Sandu making promises to minorities, also including an excerpt of the Constitutional Court ruling being read out, claiming the President has failed to deliver on her promise.

Igor Dodon claims on his Telegram account that the statistics underlying the Constitutional Court ruling is irrelevant, as the results of the 2014 census are questionable.

In turn, the Russian Embassy in Chișinău reacted, claiming “the ruling of the Constitutional Court of Moldova of January 2, which strips the Russian language of its status as a means of inter-ethnic communication, is a worrying factor in the context of maintaining inter-ethnic peace in the Moldovan state”. This reaction was followed by a commentary of Moldovan diplomacy, urging diplomatic missions to “maintain respect towards the laws, regulations and institutions in the country of their accreditation and refrain from issuing opinions that might be labeled as intrusions in the state’s internal affairs”.

Reality

Socialists and supporting media in the Republic of Moldova have snapped after a Moldovan Constitutional Court ruling threw out a law granting special status to the Russian language. They’re describing the ruling as an attack on the Russian minority, the idea circulated being that the country’s newly elected president, Maia Sandu, is held responsible for this attack, thus going back on the promises made in the election campaign.

NARRATIVES: 1. The Constitutional Court, and certain politicians led by Maia Sandu, are undermining the interests of Russian-speaking ethnic minorities. 2. Maia Sandu is behind the Constitutional Court ruling. 3. Maia Sandu has fallen short of her promises to ethnic minorities.

BACKGROUND/LOCAL ETHOS: The designation of a state language is a core identity issue the Republic of the Moldova has been struggling with since the country’s proclamation of independence. Adopted on August 27, 1991, the Declaration of Independence recalls the fight for the Romanian language. However, the Constitution, which took effect on August 18, 1994, drafted by a Parliament majority made up of former Soviet apparatchiks, stipulates under Article 13 that “the national language of the Republic of Moldova is the Moldovan language, and its writing is based on the Latin alphabet”. Multiple attempts at modifying this article fell through, all the more so as the majority of the population relishes the term “Moldovan language”. Still, on December 5, 2013, after examining a notification referring to the name of the language, the Constitutional Court ruled that the text of the Declaration of Independence coincides with the Constitution and even takes precedence over the latter, wherever differences between the two might arise.

In June, 2018, the Court ruled as obsolete the law of September 1, 1989, concerning the functioning of the languages spoken on the territory of the Moldovan Soviet Socialist Republic. Two and a half years later, in December 2020, PSRM (the Party of Socialists of the Republic of Moldova) and Șor Party Deputies voted a new law, providing, among other things, for “the use of the Russian language as a language for inter-ethnic communication on the territory of the Republic of Moldova, alongside the official state language”. Under the same law, civil servants and company workers are instructed to reply in Russian, including in writing, whenever this is requested of them. For all intents and purposes, the law makes the Russian language the official language of the Republic of Moldova.

Although they took power in June 2019, the Socialists pushed this law only after Igor Dodon’s defeat in the presidential runoff of November, 2020. Some pundits see the move as an attempt by the former president at regaining Moscow’s confidence and the support of his traditional voters, as part of them have been shifting their favor to other parties.

In a ruling cancelling the law in question, the Court writes that the law “gives the Russian language a privileged status over other languages of ethnic minorities in the Republic of Moldova, one that does not derive from the Constitution”. Moreover, the Court also notes that the provisions under Article 13 in the Constitution recognize a single official language and make no use of the phrasing “language of inter-ethnic communication”. While hailed by part of society, the decision in question was criticized by others, and some politicians, Igor Dodon first and foremost, claim it undermines ethnic minorities and might lead to a rift in society.

PURPOSE: To depict the Republic of Moldova as a multiethnic state and to overstress the role of the Russian language, which is the mother tongue of under 10% of the population. To portray Maia Sandu as the person behind this decision and blame her for any possible protests and turmoil. To undermine Maia Sandu’s mandate, although the president is yet to rely on a majority in Parliament to help her enact her governing program. To present Socialists and Igor Dodon as the defenders of ethnic minorities in the Republic of Moldova.

WHY THE NARRATIVES ARE FALSE: The Socialists and some news outlets, in addition to the Russian Embassy, refer to the Constitutional Court ruling as infringing on the rights of ethnic minorities. In fact, the Court merely ruled to revert to the state of affairs prior to the law being passed. The law wasn’t even fully binding, as it was due to take effect over the course of a year. Under the Court’s ruling, the country thus reverted to the status quo before the adoption of the law, when the Russian language was already considered a means of inter-ethnic communication.

Although the narratives point to Maia Sandu as the person responsible for the Court ruling, no consistent link has yet been established. As president, Maia Sandy holds no sway over Court rulings, evidence of that being another recent decision, whereby the Constitutional Court ruled against Parliament’s self-dissolution, which would have favored Maia Sandu, bringing her closer to forming a majority in Parliament to rely on. Furthermore, the list of MPs who lodged the constitutional challenge does not include members of the Party for Action and Solidarity, which Maia Sandu led before becoming president.

Data collected under the 2014 census reveals that 80% of citizens in the Republic of Moldova are using Romanian/Moldovan as their mother tongue, and less than 10% Russian. Igor Dodon is challenging the truthfulness of these figures. Nevertheless, the findings of the 2004 census are quite similar. At the time, 77% of the population identified Romanian/Moldovan as their mother tongue, compared to 11% of the population, who declared Russian to be their native language.

GRAIN OF TRUTH: Russian holds an important role in the Moldovan society. Large ethnic minorities essentially speak Russian on an exclusive basis.

WHO STANDS TO BENEFIT FROM THE NARRATIVES: Igor Dodon, PSRM, Moscow.

  • Publication / Media:
    Igor Dodon, Aif.md, Noi.md, the Russian Embassy in Chișinău
  • Date of publication:
    21/01/2021
  • Language / Target audience:
    Ethnic minorities, Russian speakers
  • Amplification:
    Social media, pro-PSRM and pro-Kremlin media outlets
  • Political affiliation:
    PSRM, Igor Dodon, the Kremlin
  • Key narrative:
    The interests of Russian-speaking ethnic minorities in the Republic of Moldova are being undermined, which may lead to internal conflicts, and President Maia Sandu does not honor her promises to ethnic minorities.
Cornel Ciobanu

25 Jan 2021
Cornel Ciobanu

15 minutes read
  • Socialists and supporting media in the Republic of Moldova have snapped after a Moldovan Constitutional Court ruling threw out a law granting special status to the Russian language. They’re describing the ruling as an attack on the Russian minority, the idea circulated being that the country’s newly elected president, Maia Sandu, is held responsible for this attack, thus going back on the promises made in the election campaign.
  • NARRATIVES: 1. The Constitutional Court, and certain politicians led by Maia Sandu, are undermining the interests of Russian-speaking ethnic minorities. 2. Maia Sandu is behind the Constitutional Court ruling. 3. Maia Sandu has fallen short of her promises to ethnic minorities.
  • PURPOSE: To depict the Republic of Moldova as a multiethnic state and to overstress the role of the Russian language, which is the mother tongue of under 10% of the population. To portray Maia Sandu as the person behind this decision and blame her for any possible protests and turmoil. To undermine Maia Sandu’s mandate, although the president is yet to rely on a majority in Parliament to help her enact her governing program. To present Socialists and Igor Dodon as the defenders of ethnic minorities in the Republic of Moldova.
DISINFORMATION: Romania threatens the Republic of Moldova, although it won’t be able to do anything once NATO abandons it
DISINFORMATION: Romania threatens the Republic of Moldova, although it won’t be able to do anything once NATO abandons it

Romania threatens the existence of the Republic of Moldova, although it is a weak state that will lose all its influence when NATO, caving in to Russia’s pressure, will shut down its bases on Romanian territory. The narratives are launched in the context of growing regional tensions and Russia’s requests that NATO should pull back to the West.

Mariana Vasilache
Mariana Vasilache
21 Jan 2022
DISINFORMATION: By means of the QR code from the green pass, social credit is being established and the population is enslaved
DISINFORMATION: By means of the QR code from the green pass, social credit is being established and the population is enslaved

The QR code on the green pass helps impose the so-called “social credit” system, whereby Romanians (and the rest of mankind) will be enslaved by the global cabal. The false narrative is promoted by anti-vaxx and Eurosceptic media and is linked to older conspiracy theories regarding documents with biometric data.

Cătălin Gomboș
Cătălin Gomboș
20 Jan 2022
DISINFORMATION: At the end of the Cold War, the US wanted to dismember Romania and then offered it to Russia
DISINFORMATION: At the end of the Cold War, the US wanted to dismember Romania and then offered it to Russia

The United States proposed the dismantling of Romania and wanted to offer it to Russia at the end of the Cold War, according to a piece of disinformation published in Bucharest. The offer was allegedly made based on theses from “The Clash of Civilizations”, a book that was published a few years later.

Mădălin Necșuțu
Mădălin Necșuțu
19 Jan 2022
DISINFORMATION: Ukraine is preparing a massacre in Donbas
DISINFORMATION: Ukraine is preparing a massacre in Donbas

Ukraine is planning on massacring the civilian population in Donbas, according to the separatist and Russian state media. This false narrative comes in response to Ukraine’s decision to mobilize its territorial defense forces in the face of a high risk of Russia invading the region.

Marin Gherman
Marin Gherman
18 Jan 2022