Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube LinkedIn Telegram

DISINFORMATION: Chișinău wants to denounce the Ceasefire Agreement with Transnistria

Disinformation

The Foreign Minister of the separatist region of Transnistria suggested that Moldovan authorities might denounce the 1992 Ceasefire Agreement, which could trigger a new war in the region. Chișinău, however, has never expressed its intention to denounce the Agreement, despite the fact that some of its provisions are not observed.

NEWS: These days we celebrate 30 years since the signing of the Ceasefire Agreement which de jure marked the end of the war in Transnistria. It was signed in 1992 by the presidents of Russia and the Republic of Moldova, B. Yeltsin and M. Snegur, respectively. At the time, Russian peacekeepers were brought to the region, which have since guaranteed peace in Transnistria. Nevertheless, the current lawmakers in the Republic of Moldova have been increasingly speaking about “the need to evacuate the Russian peacekeepers from Transnistria”.

[…] The Foreign Minister of the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic said in an interview for RIA Novosti that, should Chișinău decide to denounce the 1992 Agreement, it could trigger a war in the region. According to Vitaly Ignatiev, such a decision could be the prologue to an armed conflict”.

Reality

NARRATIVES: 1. Chișinău wants to denounce the 1992 Ceasefire Agreement, which could lead to a new military conflict. 2. Chișinău wants to destroy the peacekeeping mission in Transnistria.

BACKGROUND: On March 2, 1992, an armed conflict broke out in Transnistria between constitutional forces controlled by Chișinău and separatist forces in Tiraspol, backed by Moscow. The Russian 14th Army, which had been stationed on the left hand of the Dniester ever since the Soviet era, got involved in the conflict. The armed phase of the conflict ended with the signing of a Ceasefire Agreement by the then presidents of the Republic of Moldova and Russia, Mircea Snegur and Boris Yeltsin, respectively. Among other things, the agreement stipulated the setup of a demilitarized zone along the Dniester, known as the Security Zone, and the creation of a peacekeeping force made up of military from Russia, the Republic of Moldova and the separatist republic.

Many experts and politicians later criticized Agreement on the principles for a peaceful settlement of the armed conflict in the Dniester region of the Republic of Moldova, signed on July 21, 1992.  They considered it an act of surrender from Chișinău, also because the Republic of Moldova and Transnistria are described as equal belligerent factions. At the same time, pundits say the fact that Russia signed the agreement is evidence of its involvement in the war in Transnistria.

The so-called Foreign Minister of Transnistria, Vitaly Ignatiev, gave two in-depth interviews marking 30 years since the Agreement was signed. In the interview for Sputnik Moldova, Ignatiev says the majority of the population in the breakaway region voted in favor of independence at the 2006 referendum (which the international community did not recognize), with the possibility of later joining the Russian Federation.

In the interview for RIA Novosti, Ignatiev speaks about Chișinău possibly denouncing the Agreement and the consequence of such an action.

During the same period, Russian diplomat Dmitry Belik said that Transnistria’s readiness to join Russia should be “seriously” examined and should be regarded as a possibility “in the near future”.

Tensions linked to the breakaway region of Transnistria, separating the Republic of Moldova from Ukraine, escalated with the Russian invasion of the latter. On more than one occasion Russian officials, including the Kremlin’s top propaganda theorist, Vladimir Solovyov, mentioned Russia’s intention of reaching this region.

PURPOSE: To promote the idea that Moldovan authorities plan to denounce the ceasefire agreement, thus justifying a possible military intervention from Russia “to ensure peace in the region and protect Russian citizens in the region”.

WHY THE NARRATIVES ARE FALSE: Chișinău has never expressed plans, nor has it ever brought up the question of denouncing the 1992 agreement, even if some of its provisions, such as observing free movement, are not observed.

Denouncing Chișinău’s requests regarding the evacuation of Russian peacekeepers has already become part of Kremlin and Tiraspol propaganda. In fact, the Republic of Moldova has called on Russia to evacuate its troops and Soviet-era munitions. These are two separate issues. At the OSCE Summit in Istanbul in 1999, Russia pledged to withdraw its forces and munitions from Transnistria by 2001, although to this day that never happened.

Tags: Republica Moldova , Transnistria , The war in Transnistria
  • Publication / Media:
    topwar.ru
  • Date of publication:
    21/07/2022
  • Target audience:
    Pro-Russian citizens, the population in Moldova, the public in Russia
  • Political affiliation:
    the Kremlin
  • Key narrative:
    Chișinău wants to denounce the Ceasefire Agreement, which could trigger a new war in Transnistria
Veridica

25 Jul 2022

Updated at: 31 Jul 2022 06:53:57
Veridica

Follow us on Google News

25 minutes read
DISINFORMATION: A blackout will sweep Romania during the holidays so that patriots can be assassinated
DISINFORMATION: A blackout will sweep Romania during the holidays so that patriots can be assassinated

Brussels has given the go-ahead for the physical and spiritual destruction of Romania, one of the last bastions in the fight against globalism, and a blackout will be triggered in this country so that sovereigntists can be taken out. This piece of disinformation stemmed from a dialogue between Luis Lazarus and Diana Iovanovici-Șoșoacă. Ridden with mystical drivel, lies and elements recalling of Nazi propaganda, the narrative surfaced in response to the first “blackout” simulation organized in Romania two weeks ago in Mediaș.

Veridica
Veridica
30 Nov 2022
DISINFORMATION: The International Court of Justice admitted Russia was not involved in the downing of flight MH17 in 2014
DISINFORMATION: The International Court of Justice admitted Russia was not involved in the downing of flight MH17 in 2014

According to the ruling of the International Court of Justice, Russia was not involved in the downing of aircraft MH17, which was transiting the airspace of Donbas in 2014, pro-Kremlin media writes. In fact, the Dutch tribunal has recognized Russia’s involvement in this crime against civilians.

Marin Gherman
Marin Gherman
22 Nov 2022
DISINFORMATION: Pro-Europeans in Chișinău are creating a military autocracy that will be impervious to democratic change
DISINFORMATION: Pro-Europeans in Chișinău are creating a military autocracy that will be impervious to democratic change

The Republic of Moldova is building up its military, and the pro-European government is creating a dictatorial regime that will be hard to oust by democratic due process, Socialist deputy Bogdan Țîrdea has told Pravda. The Moldovan politician in fact reiterates false claims that have been increasingly disseminated by Russian propaganda and pro-Moscow politicians in Chișinău.

Veridica
Veridica
24 Oct 2022
DISINFORMATION: Chisinau was developed by the Russians and fell into disrepair under the Romanian administration
DISINFORMATION: Chisinau was developed by the Russians and fell into disrepair under the Romanian administration

Chisinau developed only during the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union and fell into disrepair during the period of the union with Romania and the independence of the Republic of Moldova, according to a narrative in the Russian media. In reality, Chisinau developed significantly during the time it was part of Romania and was largely destroyed by the Red Army in 1941 and 1944, before being rebuilt in the Soviet style.

Mariana Vasilache
Mariana Vasilache
21 Oct 2022